Blogging Daytonnati, the nation, and the world.
Search
this site:
XML RDF
 
  Home | Archives | Categories | | About Me
XML RDF
 
 
 
Thursday, January 6, 2005
Oliver Stone's in denial

He's claiming Alexander flopped because of "raging fundamentalism in morality".

Hey, when Roger Ebert, a pretty liberal guy himself, can only muster two stars you've got problems other than the public oh-so-parochially sticking to their moral guns. (Boy, that last sentence can't decide whether it wants to be sarcastic or not...)

Posted by Rob Bernard on Thursday, January 06, 2005 at 11:55 AM in Movies


Comments

DISAPPOINTING, is one word that comes to mind when we think of Oliver stone's, 'Alexander'. For some one who is of Persian decent, to see my race portrayed as barbarians looking like Arabs, was most disheartening.
King Darius, is named the sixth great Law giver of Egypt for his good acts, which included the completion of the canal linking the red & Mediterranean seas, nearly 2,500 years before Lesseps Suez Canal. the Persians were the ones to author the world's first Charter of human rights. The Persian king, "Cyrus the Great", is called the "anointed of the Lord" in the bible. For thousands of years before the Arab conquest, the religion of Zarathustra had been followed by the Persians, & it is worth noting, that though there were numerous countries & people under the Persian rule, they were not all 'Zorostrianized', this is testimony to the fact that they respected all righteous people, irrespective of their race or religion. Herodotus, the 'father of history', noted 2,500 years ago, that Paris youths are "carefully instructed, from their fifth to their twentieth year in three things alone, to ride, to draw the bow & to speak the Truth"...... & yet, Oliver stone has portrayed this great empire the way he has, as BARBARIANS ?? an empire that has enough gold to feed 3 generations of Greeks, is shown to have an army on foot wearing dirty dish wash like cloths as head gears in war ! "how would you like to be treated?" "like a Princess" is a dialogue, Historically recorded to have taken place between Alexander & King Porusp, when the latter is captured by Alexander, & not between a Persian princess & Alexander, as depicted. in his attempt to make us believe that Alexander was not all ambition, he has very cleverly omitted to show that Alexander, in one of his drunken orgies, had burnt down one of the greatest known libraries of those time in Persipolis, for which Alexander is known by the Persians as not "Alexander the great" but "Alexander the accursed"....Mr. Stone, next time you venture into making a historical Movie.......do your home work & get your facts straight.

Posted by: Shernaz Lala at January 16, 2005 04:31 AM

Post a comment

Due to comment spam I can no longer accept comments posted without a Typekey identity. Typekey registration is free and easy and can be used on many Movabletype-powered blogs.

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


 
XML RDF


Creative Commons License
This site and all associated works created by Rob Bernard are unless otherwise stated licensed under a Creative Commons License.

My Ecosystem Details