Thursday, February 24, 2005
More on E-check
The Equirer and the Post both have anti-E-check editorials today.
The Enquirer's offers this warning:
Some E-Check haters may now be leery: Be careful what you ask for. Costs of alternatives are likely to be passed through to consumers in other ways. Ohio EPA says cleaner-burning fuels would cost motorists about 3 cents a gallon more - around $30 a year for the average driver.Fine. At least that way my money will go towards cleaning the air. As it currently is, 97% of tests are simply $19.50 charges that result in no difference in air quality.
Post a comment
Due to comment spam I can no longer accept comments posted without a Typekey identity. Typekey registration is free and easy and can be used on many Movabletype-powered blogs.Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Instapundit
The cars that actually do the polluting should bear the cost.
See http://porkopolis.blogspot.com/2005/01/ohio-e-check.html for a new strategy.
Posted by: Porkopolis at February 28, 2005 09:40 PM